Bloggers Wanted
We're looking for people to help with the main blog. If you are consistent, knowledgeable and you're into it, please drop me a note.
|
|
|
|
|
Freebird335
Senior Boarder
Posts: 64
|
|
Has anyone else attempted to use the Cambridge DOS program to evaluate a flight that was generated in a 302? Although there is reason to believe that the turnpoints were declared and sent to the 302 prior to the flight they do not show up when the flight is reviewed in the CAI DOS program and the DOS program also indicates that there was no declared task. When the Aero Explorer software is used to view the flight the turnpoints do show up without loading an additional nav-point file so it appears that the turnpoints are somehow contained within the flight log.
The DOS program does a better job of printing out nice pages that help document the flight, but I'm getting the impression that this won't work for 302 generated flight logs.
Anyone out there with similar experience?
Thanks,
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
David S
Senior Boarder
Posts: 63
|
|
Have you downloaded and installed the patch to the DOS program that Cambridge put online about last Oct?
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Bhah_Humbug
Senior Boarder
Posts: 61
|
|
I have been using 5.884 which is the latest version per cambridge.
Has anyone else done any evaluations of flight logs (with declarations) that originated in a 302?
Thanks
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
0-lee
Senior Boarder
Posts: 62
|
|
Has anyone sent a claim for a badge to the SSA that was based on a flight log that originated in a 302? Was it approved or denied and why. While I have not sent anything to the SSA for a badge, there still appears to be considerable confusion on what appears to be changes in the way the 302 documents a task declaration and how that change will require changes in how the flight log is reviewed.
Thanks,
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|